Oregon's Hybrid Dog Bite Rule
Oregon is neither purely strict liability nor purely one-bite.
Strict liability for economic damages
Oregon law establishes a dog owner's strict liability for economic damages resulting from any injury caused by a dog, not just a bite. Under ORS 31.360, a plaintiff does not need to prove that the owner could foresee that the dog would cause injury.
Pain and suffering needs more
For full compensation including pain and suffering, the victim has to prove negligence, violation of an animal control law like a leash law, or that the dog was known to be vicious toward humans.
The one-bite element
An owner who knows the dog tends to bite or attack can be held strictly liable if the dog eventually injures someone.
Dangerous dogs
Under ORS 609.098, animal control can designate a dog as dangerous or potentially dangerous, with obligations like a secure enclosure, muzzling in public and liability insurance.
Deadline
Dog bite claims have two years under ORS 12.110.
A local personal injury attorney can review your claim — many offer a free consultation.
Official sources
This is general information, not legal advice, and the state comparisons above are illustrative, not an exhaustive survey. Confirm how Oregon's rules apply to your specific case with a licensed Oregon attorney.