Vermont and the 21 States With a 51% Fault Bar Rule

Twenty-one states share this threshold — but Vermont's approach to multi-defendant liability genuinely stands apart from its neighbors.

The more common modified comparative threshold

Among US states using some form of modified comparative negligence, a majority use the more forgiving 51% threshold — recovery is barred only once the claimant's fault actually exceeds the defendant's. A smaller group of states uses a stricter 50% version instead, where recovery is barred at fault merely equal to the other side's.

The 21 states using a 51% bar

Vermont's peer group under this more common threshold is: Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana (for accidents from 2026 onward), Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

A shared threshold with a close neighbor

Vermont's neighbor New Hampshire also uses the 51% bar, making this a shared rule across that particular state line — even as each state's own surrounding liability rules can genuinely differ.

A genuinely distinctive application within this shared group

Here's where Vermont stands apart from much of this list. Vermont applies several-only liability among defendants specifically when the plaintiff shares some fault, but reverts to traditional joint and several liability when the plaintiff bears no fault at all. New Hampshire, another member of this same 51%-bar group, uses a genuinely different mechanism instead: joint and several liability there turns on whether any single defendant is found 50% or more at fault, not on whether the plaintiff shares any responsibility.

Why this matters in a disputed claim

Because none of these 21 states bars recovery at an even 50/50 split, a disputed fault percentage near the midpoint still results in meaningful recovery across the group — but in Vermont specifically, whether that recovery comes from one defendant or must be chased proportionally from several depends on a genuinely different question than in most of its peer states. See our full comparison of how Vermont's rule fits among all four fault systems for the complete picture.

States with a 51% fault bar — frequently asked questions

Which states use a 51% bar for comparative negligence?

Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana (for recent accidents), Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

Is the 51% bar the most common modified comparative negligence approach?

Yes. More states use a 51% bar than the stricter 50% bar, making Vermont's basic threshold the more typical modified comparative rule nationally.

Does Vermont's neighbor New Hampshire share the same 51% bar?

Yes — New Hampshire also uses a 51% bar, making this a shared rule across that state line, though the two states' surrounding liability rules differ in real ways.

What makes Vermont genuinely distinctive within this group of 51%-bar states?

Its split liability rule. Vermont applies several-only liability specifically when the plaintiff shares fault, but keeps traditional joint and several liability when the plaintiff bears no fault at all — a structure not shared by every state in this group.

Does New Hampshire use the same split liability approach as Vermont?

No, not in the same way. New Hampshire instead ties joint and several liability to whether any single defendant is found 50% or more at fault, a genuinely different mechanism from Vermont's plaintiff-fault-based split.

This page provides general guidance only and is not legal advice. Figures are based on general US negligence law and Vermont statute (12 V.S.A. § 1036), verified per our methodology. Confirm how these rules apply to a specific claim with a licensed attorney in the relevant state before acting.