A reasonableness-only state for fees
Compare Wyoming to a state like New York, which applies a hard statutory sliding scale to medical malpractice attorney fees specifically. Wyoming has no equivalent figure for any type of personal injury claim — the fee simply must be reasonable, reviewed under Rule 1.5 and the state's own dedicated contingent fee rules, with a formal state bar committee available to resolve disputes.
A constitutional ban, not a legislative gap
Wyoming's lack of a damages cap isn't simply an absence of legislation — the state constitution affirmatively forbids any law limiting damages for injury or death against a private defendant. That's a stronger and more unusual footing than most no-cap states, which typically rely on either legislative inaction or a single court ruling that a future legislature could try to work around.
Two separate questions, both currently uncapped
It's worth being clear that a damages cap and an attorney fee cap are entirely separate legal questions. Wyoming's constitutional provision addresses only damages against private defendants; it says nothing about what a plaintiff's attorney can charge. A 2025 proposal from the Wyoming Medical Society recommended a statutory fee cap specifically for malpractice cases — a change that wouldn't require touching the constitutional damages provision at all, since the two questions don't overlap.
The narrow exception doesn't touch fees either
Wyoming's $250,000 cap on certain government-entity claims limits what a plaintiff can recover from that specific type of defendant. The attorney's own percentage fee on that recovery remains governed entirely by Rule 1.5's reasonableness standard, untouched by the government-claim cap.