A reasonableness-only state for fees
Compare Ohio to a state like New York, which applies a hard statutory sliding scale to medical malpractice attorney fees specifically. Ohio has no equivalent figure anywhere in its rules for any type of personal injury claim, including malpractice — the fee simply must be reasonable under Prof.Cond.R. 1.5, assessed case by case.
Two separate things that sound related but aren't
It's worth being clear that Ohio's medical malpractice damages cap — the two-tier structure under R.C. 2323.43 — has nothing to do with attorney fees. That cap limits what a patient can recover from a health care provider; the attorney's own percentage fee remains governed entirely by Prof.Cond.R. 1.5's reasonableness standard, untouched by whatever the damages cap happens to be in a given case.
A damages cap genuinely in dispute right now
While this page focuses on fees rather than damages, it's worth noting that Ohio's catastrophic-injury damages cap is the subject of a real, current split among the state's appellate courts, with the Ohio Supreme Court having heard oral arguments in February 2026 and a decision still pending. This is a live, unresolved legal question — worth tracking separately from the fee question this page addresses.
A different regime for workers' compensation
Ohio's one area with a genuine statutory fee cap sits outside ordinary personal injury law: workers' compensation attorney fees have historically carried their own separate statutory limit, distinct from the Prof.Cond.R. 1.5 reasonableness standard that governs personal injury contingency fees.