Montana: Case Costs vs. Attorney Fees, Explained

Two deductions, two very different purposes — and a distinction Montana courts have kept carefully separate even when a case doesn't go as originally planned.

The attorney's fee: compensation for the work

The contingency fee is the attorney's own compensation for handling the case — calculated as a percentage of the settlement or award. It's earnings, not a reimbursement, and it's what the attorney keeps for taking on the risk and the work of the case.

Case costs: real expenses the case required

Case costs are something entirely different: actual out-of-pocket expenses the case genuinely needed. This typically includes expert witness fees, court filing fees, the cost of obtaining medical records, deposition transcripts, and similar litigation expenses. These are reimbursed, not earned.

The distinction survives even when a case ends unexpectedly

In Campbell v. Bozeman Investors of Duluth (1998), the Montana Supreme Court addressed what a fired attorney was owed after a client switched counsel mid-case. The court's analysis kept the attorney's fee question — the reasonable value of services performed — conceptually separate from any genuine costs the attorney had advanced, rather than treating the full contingency agreement as an all-or-nothing package. That same separation applies in the more ordinary case where representation runs its full course.

Reasonableness covers both

Montana Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5's reasonableness standard isn't limited to the percentage fee alone — expenses charged to the client are also expected to meet that same basic standard, even though they're calculated on an entirely different basis than the fee itself.

Who fronts the money while the case is pending

Commonly, the attorney's office advances case costs as the litigation proceeds, with reimbursement coming out of the eventual settlement or award. The specific arrangement, including what happens to those advanced costs if the case doesn't result in any recovery, depends entirely on the individual fee agreement.

Case costs vs. attorney fees — frequently asked questions

What's the real difference between case costs and an attorney's fee in Montana?

The fee is the attorney's own compensation for handling the case, calculated as a percentage of the recovery. Case costs are actual out-of-pocket expenses the case required — they're reimbursed, not earned.

What typically counts as a case cost in a Montana personal injury claim?

Expert witness fees, court filing fees, the cost of obtaining medical records, deposition transcripts, and similar litigation expenses the attorney's office pays on the client's behalf while the case is pending.

Does the fee-vs-costs distinction still matter if a case ends earlier than expected?

Yes — Montana case law shows that even when a client switches attorneys mid-case, courts still separate what's owed for the attorney's actual work from what's owed to reimburse any costs genuinely advanced.

Does Rule 1.5's reasonableness standard apply to case costs as well as the fee?

Yes. The reasonableness requirement in Montana Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5 is not limited to the percentage fee itself; expenses charged to the client are also expected to be reasonable.

Who fronts case costs while a Montana personal injury case is ongoing?

Commonly, the attorney's office advances these costs during the case, with reimbursement coming out of the eventual settlement or award — though the specific arrangement depends on the individual fee agreement.

This page provides general guidance only and is not legal advice. Figures are based on Montana Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5 and Campbell v. Bozeman Investors of Duluth, 290 Mont. 374 (1998), verified per our methodology. Confirm the exact terms of a specific fee agreement with a licensed Montana attorney before acting.