Illinois Co-Representatives: How Is the Fee Split?

There's no formula here either — just the same reasonableness question, asked separately about each co-representative's actual work.

755 ILCS 5/27-1 FigureMyTax Editorial Team

Quick answer: No, Illinois co-representatives don't automatically each collect their own full compensation with a combined total that grows by headcount. 755 ILCS 5/27-1 contains no separate provision for multiple representatives — the same "reasonable compensation" standard governs, and the value of each co-representative's actual services determines what they're individually owed, generally bounded by what reasonable compensation for the whole administration would be. Estimate the underlying reasonable range first with the Illinois executor fee calculator.

No statutory split, because there's no statutory schedule to split

755 ILCS 5/27-1: "A representative is entitled to reasonable compensation for his services." Unlike states with an explicit statutory percentage and a numbered multi-representative subsection (Florida, New York, Missouri, California), Illinois's reasonableness-only standard has nothing to say specifically about co-representatives — because it has nothing to say specifically about a percentage schedule at all.

Each co-representative's work is assessed on its own

Because reasonableness under § 27-1 turns on the size and complexity of the estate, the time actually spent, and the skill required, a court dividing compensation among co-representatives would naturally look at what each person individually contributed — not an automatic even split, and not a separate full fee multiplied by however many people are serving.

Both still carry first-class claim priority

755 ILCS 5/18-10: whatever amount is awarded to each co-representative under § 27-1 keeps its first-class claim status, the same as it would for a sole representative — the priority attaches to fees awarded under that section, not to a single-representative scenario specifically.

Real coordination costs, same as anywhere

Co-representatives in Illinois share fiduciary duties, and disagreements about pace, priorities, or how to divide tasks can slow administration or invite disputes — a practical consideration independent of how compensation eventually gets divided.

Worked example

Two siblings serve as co-representatives of an Illinois estate. One handles the bulk of the administrative work; the other contributes occasionally. A sole representative doing all the work might reasonably bill 40 hours at $40/hr, or $1,600.

Co-representativeHoursRateCompensation
Sibling A (primary administrator)32 hrs$40/hr$1,280
Sibling B (occasional support)8 hrs$40/hr$320

Each figure reflects that person's own reasonable compensation for their own time, combining to roughly the same total a sole representative's full administration would have reasonably cost.

Facing probate in Illinois?

A local probate attorney can review your estate — many offer a free consultation.

Talk to an Illinois attorney

Illinois co-representatives — frequently asked questions

Do Illinois co-representatives each get their own reasonable compensation?

755 ILCS 5/27-1 contains no separate provision for multiple representatives; the same reasonable-compensation standard applies to the estate's administration as a whole, and courts assess each co-representative's compensation based on the value of their own actual services.

Does adding a co-representative increase the total compensation available in Illinois?

Not automatically. Because compensation is tied to the reasonable value of services actually rendered rather than a fixed formula per person, the combined total for co-representatives is generally assessed against what the whole administration was worth, not multiplied by headcount.

Do both Illinois co-representatives' fees get first-class claim priority?

Yes, to the extent each fee is actually awarded under Section 27-1. The first-class claim classification under § 18-10 applies to fees awarded under that section regardless of how many representatives are serving.

How would an Illinois court likely divide compensation between co-representatives?

Because reasonableness under § 27-1 turns on the size and complexity of the estate, time spent, and skill required, a court would likely look at what each individual actually contributed rather than splitting evenly by default.

Do co-representatives in Illinois create extra coordination risk?

Yes — sharing fiduciary duties among co-representatives can slow administration or invite disputes over pace and priorities, a practical consideration independent of how compensation eventually gets divided.

Estimate for general guidance only, not legal advice. Based on 755 ILCS 5/27-1 and 5/18-10. Illinois has no statutory formula for dividing compensation among co-representatives; each person's compensation is assessed on their own reasonable services, generally bounded by what reasonable compensation for the whole administration would be. Consult an Illinois probate attorney to resolve a specific dispute over compensation between co-representatives.