Utah Comparative Negligence Calculator (50% Bar)

Utah bars recovery at an exact 50-50 tie — and for car accidents, a separate no-fault threshold has to be crossed before this analysis even starts.

Modified comparative fault, 50% bar FigureMyTax Editorial Team Free · no sign-up

Where does your fault percentage land?

Enter your estimated damages and your best estimate of your own share of fault. In Utah, exactly where you land relative to 49% and 50% changes everything.

$
You can still recover
—
Injured in Utah?

A local personal injury attorney can review your claim — many offer a free consultation.

Talk to an Utah attorney

Utah's rule: barred at an exact tie

Under Utah Code § 78B-5-818, "the fault of a person seeking recovery may not alone bar recovery" — unless that fault reaches 50% or more, at which point recovery is barred entirely. This is the stricter of the two common modified thresholds: an exact 50-50 split bars recovery in Utah, unlike states that still allow recovery at an even split.

Worked example

Someone with $100,000 in damages, found 49% at fault, recovers $51,000. That same person, found exactly 50% at fault, recovers nothing at all.

A genuinely distinctive wrinkle: Utah's no-fault PIP threshold

Here's something that catches many people off guard. Utah is a no-fault state for auto accidents, which means a car accident claimant generally must first cross a separate Personal Injury Protection (PIP) tort threshold before the fault-based comparative negligence analysis under § 78B-5-818 even comes into play. See our full guide to how fault and no-fault rules work together in Utah for what this means in practice, including a genuinely reassuring detail about what happens to your PIP benefits even if the 50% bar applies.

No joint and several liability

Utah abolished joint and several liability alongside its comparative fault statute. A defendant found liable is now generally responsible only for their own proportional share of fault, not a co-defendant's share as well.

Utah comparative negligence — frequently asked questions

Does Utah use a 50% or 51% bar for comparative negligence?

A 50% bar. Under Utah Code section 78B-5-818, a plaintiff found 50% or more at fault recovers nothing — an exact tie is enough to bar recovery entirely.

What happens if I'm found exactly 50% at fault in Utah?

You recover nothing. Utah's rule bars recovery once fault reaches 50%, not only once it exceeds that level.

Does Utah's comparative fault rule apply automatically to every car accident claim?

No. Utah is a no-fault state for auto accidents, so a plaintiff generally must first cross a separate PIP tort threshold before the fault-based comparative negligence analysis even applies.

Do I lose my no-fault PIP benefits if I'm barred from a Utah tort claim by the 50% rule?

No. PIP benefits generally remain intact even for a plaintiff found 50% or more at fault and barred from recovering in tort.

Does Utah use joint and several liability?

No. Utah abolished joint and several liability alongside its comparative fault statute, so a defendant is generally only responsible for their own proportional share of fault.

This calculator provides an estimate for general guidance only and is not legal advice. Figures are based on Utah statute (Utah Code § 78B-5-818, § 78B-5-820) verified per our methodology. Confirm how these rules apply to a specific claim with a licensed Utah attorney before acting.