The less common, stricter modified threshold
Among the US states that use some form of modified comparative negligence, a minority use the stricter 50% threshold — recovery is barred once the claimant's fault merely equals the defendant's, not only once it exceeds it. A larger group of 20-plus states uses the more forgiving 51% version instead.
The roughly dozen states using a 50% bar
Nebraska's peer group under this stricter threshold is: Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Maine, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia.
A genuine split right at Nebraska's border
Nebraska's neighbor Iowa is a notable contrast to any assumption of regional uniformity: Iowa actually uses the more forgiving 51% bar, meaning a claimant found exactly 50% at fault recovers something driving in Iowa but nothing at all in otherwise similar circumstances just across the Missouri River in Nebraska.
Shared threshold, separate statutes
All of these states share the same core outcome — fault equal to or greater than the defendant's bars recovery — but each codifies this under its own statute, with its own precise wording and body of case law. Nebraska's version, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,185.09, is paired with the state's genuinely longer four-year general statute of limitations, a combination worth understanding together when evaluating any Nebraska claim.
Why this matters in a disputed claim
Because all 12 of these states bar recovery at an even 50/50 split, a disputed fault percentage that lands right at the midpoint results in zero recovery across this entire group — a real, practical difference from the larger group of 51%-bar states. See our full comparison of how Nebraska's rule fits among all four fault systems for the complete picture.